The Hastings Development Management Plan Sustainability Appraisal (SA) Report November 2012

Object

Representation ID: 5401

Received: 14/04/2013

Table 18.1
No mention of the value of the provision of ecosystem services by open and green spaces such as Robsack Meadow and Speckled Wood and idea of how destroying them will help.
No mention of how destroying buildings like the Former Convent of the Holy Child of Jesus will help achieve the protecting the historic environment.

Support

Representation ID: 5402

Received: 14/04/2013

Site B16 I agree with the adverse affects on biodiversity development should be avoided.

Object

Representation ID: 5403

Received: 14/04/2013

Site B24, considering that developing is more positive if it is located within the 20% most deprived areas nationwide is mistaken logic. This site is valuable and should be left alone.

Object

Representation ID: 5404

Received: 14/04/2013

B31 should be taken off of the site allocation list as Policy CLBX, does not make explicit reference to the English Heritage guidance on Enabling Development. Any application submitted with a Viability Appraisal for Enabling Development will only be recommended for approval if it is in accordance with the English Heritage Guidance as detailed in Enabling Development and the Conservation of Significant Places (2008).

Object

Representation ID: 5405

Received: 14/04/2013

b31
Any proposal for this site will only be acceptable if it secures the restoration and long term future of these heritage assets. As a last resort this could be achieved by means of enabling development in accordance with the English Heritage guidance.

Object

Representation ID: 5406

Received: 14/04/2013

A18: should be taken off the plan the local community want use it as it provides ecosystem services and is valuable open space. They want it as a LNR.