Comment

Representation ID: 1971

Received: 30/08/2011

Areas 3, 6 and 7 on the lower estimate are being expected to provide 45% of the housing. Developments should be of a density commensurate with that in the rest of the town; parts of south StL that still enjoy lower densities a recognistion of the prevailing standard should be shown. To keep on building at the proposed level will destroy the USP for tourism and residence and will not guarantee economic revival, but will contribute to ills associated with urban overcrowding. Before building, sites and funding should be identified for community facilities etc that are constantly overlooked.