Hastings Planning Strategy Proposed Submission Version
Search representations
Results for Rother District Council search
New searchSupport
Hastings Planning Strategy Proposed Submission Version
4.21
Representation ID: 3839
Received: 17/08/2012
The overall quantum of housing proposed is supported.
The overall quantum of housing proposed is supported.
Support
Hastings Planning Strategy Proposed Submission Version
Policy DS1: New Housing Development
Representation ID: 3840
Received: 17/08/2012
The overall quantum of housing development proposed is supported.
The overall quantum of housing development proposed is supported.
Support
Hastings Planning Strategy Proposed Submission Version
Policy DS2: Employment Growth
Representation ID: 3841
Received: 17/08/2012
The overall quantum of employment floorspace proposed is supported.
The overall quantum of employment floorspace proposed is supported.
Support
Hastings Planning Strategy Proposed Submission Version
4.41
Representation ID: 3842
Received: 17/08/2012
The overall quantum of employment floorspace proposed is supported.
The overall quantum of employment floorspace proposed is supported.
Object
Hastings Planning Strategy Proposed Submission Version
5.8
Representation ID: 3847
Received: 17/08/2012
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Rother District Council object to the reference to renewable energy generation in the Combe Valley Countryside Park, as no comprehensive assessment has been made to determine this is the most appropriate area. Further investigative work is required to determine the most suitable location and therefore it is not appropriate to limit this potential to the Combe Valley Countryside Park, particularly given its objectives (nature conservation, recreation and strategic gap). It is considered more appropriate to make policy references to the fringes of Hastings and duly qualify the regard to the above issues in identifying any suitable locations.
Rother District Council object to the reference to renewable energy generation in the Combe Valley Countryside Park (and to the inclusion of an area identified on the key diagram is shown in the Rother District boundary), as no comprehensive assessment has been made to determine this is the most appropriate area. Further investigative work is required to determine the most suitable location and therefore it is not appropriate to limit this potential to the Combe Valley Countryside Park, particularly given its objectives (nature conservation, recreation and strategic gap). It is considered more appropriate to make policy references to the fringes of Hastings and duly qualify the regard to the above issues in identifying any suitable locations.
Object
Hastings Planning Strategy Proposed Submission Version
Policy FA1: Strategic Policy for Western Area
Representation ID: 3848
Received: 17/08/2012
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Rother District Council object to the reference to renewable energy generation in the Combe Valley Countryside Park, as no comprehensive assessment has been made to determine this is the most appropriate area. Further investigative work is required to determine the most suitable location and therefore it is not appropriate to limit this potential to the Combe Valley Countryside Park, particularly given its objectives (nature conservation, recreation and strategic gap). It is considered more appropriate to make policy references to the fringes of Hastings and duly qualify the regard to the above issues in identifying any suitable locations.
Rother District Council object to the reference to renewable energy generation in the Combe Valley Countryside Park (and to the inclusion of an area identified on the key diagram is shown in the Rother District boundary), as no comprehensive assessment has been made to determine this is the most appropriate area. Further investigative work is required to determine the most suitable location and therefore it is not appropriate to limit this potential to the Combe Valley Countryside Park, particularly given its objectives (nature conservation, recreation and strategic gap). It is considered more appropriate to make policy references to the fringes of Hastings and duly qualify the regard to the above issues in identifying any suitable locations.
Object
Hastings Planning Strategy Proposed Submission Version
6.17
Representation ID: 3850
Received: 17/08/2012
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Rother District Council object to the reference to renewable energy generation in the Combe Valley Countryside Park, as no comprehensive assessment has been made to determine this is the most appropriate area. Further investigative work is required to determine the most suitable location and therefore it is not appropriate to limit this potential to the Combe Valley Countryside Park, particularly given its objectives (nature conservation, recreation and strategic gap). It is considered more appropriate to make policy references to the fringes of Hastings and duly qualify the regard to the above issues in identifying any suitable locations.
Rother District Council object to the reference to renewable energy generation in the Combe Valley Countryside Park (and to the inclusion of an area identified on the key diagram is shown in the Rother District boundary), as no comprehensive assessment has been made to determine this is the most appropriate area. Further investigative work is required to determine the most suitable location and therefore it is not appropriate to limit this potential to the Combe Valley Countryside Park, particularly given its objectives (nature conservation, recreation and strategic gap). It is considered more appropriate to make policy references to the fringes of Hastings and duly qualify the regard to the above issues in identifying any suitable locations.
Object
Hastings Planning Strategy Proposed Submission Version
Key Diagram
Representation ID: 3860
Received: 17/08/2012
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Rother District Council objects to the inclusion of an area shown in the Rother District boundary identified on the key diagram.
Rother District Council object to the reference to renewable energy generation in the Combe Valley Countryside Park (and to the inclusion of an area identified on the key diagram is shown in the Rother District boundary), as no comprehensive assessment has been made to determine this is the most appropriate area. Further investigative work is required to determine the most suitable location and therefore it is not appropriate to limit this potential to the Combe Valley Countryside Park, particularly given its objectives (nature conservation, recreation and strategic gap). It is considered more appropriate to make policy references to the fringes of Hastings and duly qualify the regard to the above issues in identifying any suitable locations.