Hastings Planning Strategy Proposed Submission Version

Search representations

Results for Rother District Council search

New search New search

Support

Hastings Planning Strategy Proposed Submission Version

4.21

Representation ID: 3839

Received: 17/08/2012

Representation Summary:

The overall quantum of housing proposed is supported.

Full text:

The overall quantum of housing proposed is supported.

Support

Hastings Planning Strategy Proposed Submission Version

Policy DS1: New Housing Development

Representation ID: 3840

Received: 17/08/2012

Representation Summary:

The overall quantum of housing development proposed is supported.

Full text:

The overall quantum of housing development proposed is supported.

Support

Hastings Planning Strategy Proposed Submission Version

Policy DS2: Employment Growth

Representation ID: 3841

Received: 17/08/2012

Representation Summary:

The overall quantum of employment floorspace proposed is supported.

Full text:

The overall quantum of employment floorspace proposed is supported.

Support

Hastings Planning Strategy Proposed Submission Version

4.41

Representation ID: 3842

Received: 17/08/2012

Representation Summary:

The overall quantum of employment floorspace proposed is supported.

Full text:

The overall quantum of employment floorspace proposed is supported.

Object

Hastings Planning Strategy Proposed Submission Version

5.8

Representation ID: 3847

Received: 17/08/2012

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Rother District Council object to the reference to renewable energy generation in the Combe Valley Countryside Park, as no comprehensive assessment has been made to determine this is the most appropriate area. Further investigative work is required to determine the most suitable location and therefore it is not appropriate to limit this potential to the Combe Valley Countryside Park, particularly given its objectives (nature conservation, recreation and strategic gap). It is considered more appropriate to make policy references to the fringes of Hastings and duly qualify the regard to the above issues in identifying any suitable locations.

Full text:

Rother District Council object to the reference to renewable energy generation in the Combe Valley Countryside Park (and to the inclusion of an area identified on the key diagram is shown in the Rother District boundary), as no comprehensive assessment has been made to determine this is the most appropriate area. Further investigative work is required to determine the most suitable location and therefore it is not appropriate to limit this potential to the Combe Valley Countryside Park, particularly given its objectives (nature conservation, recreation and strategic gap). It is considered more appropriate to make policy references to the fringes of Hastings and duly qualify the regard to the above issues in identifying any suitable locations.

Object

Hastings Planning Strategy Proposed Submission Version

Policy FA1: Strategic Policy for Western Area

Representation ID: 3848

Received: 17/08/2012

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Rother District Council object to the reference to renewable energy generation in the Combe Valley Countryside Park, as no comprehensive assessment has been made to determine this is the most appropriate area. Further investigative work is required to determine the most suitable location and therefore it is not appropriate to limit this potential to the Combe Valley Countryside Park, particularly given its objectives (nature conservation, recreation and strategic gap). It is considered more appropriate to make policy references to the fringes of Hastings and duly qualify the regard to the above issues in identifying any suitable locations.

Full text:

Rother District Council object to the reference to renewable energy generation in the Combe Valley Countryside Park (and to the inclusion of an area identified on the key diagram is shown in the Rother District boundary), as no comprehensive assessment has been made to determine this is the most appropriate area. Further investigative work is required to determine the most suitable location and therefore it is not appropriate to limit this potential to the Combe Valley Countryside Park, particularly given its objectives (nature conservation, recreation and strategic gap). It is considered more appropriate to make policy references to the fringes of Hastings and duly qualify the regard to the above issues in identifying any suitable locations.

Object

Hastings Planning Strategy Proposed Submission Version

6.17

Representation ID: 3850

Received: 17/08/2012

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Rother District Council object to the reference to renewable energy generation in the Combe Valley Countryside Park, as no comprehensive assessment has been made to determine this is the most appropriate area. Further investigative work is required to determine the most suitable location and therefore it is not appropriate to limit this potential to the Combe Valley Countryside Park, particularly given its objectives (nature conservation, recreation and strategic gap). It is considered more appropriate to make policy references to the fringes of Hastings and duly qualify the regard to the above issues in identifying any suitable locations.

Full text:

Rother District Council object to the reference to renewable energy generation in the Combe Valley Countryside Park (and to the inclusion of an area identified on the key diagram is shown in the Rother District boundary), as no comprehensive assessment has been made to determine this is the most appropriate area. Further investigative work is required to determine the most suitable location and therefore it is not appropriate to limit this potential to the Combe Valley Countryside Park, particularly given its objectives (nature conservation, recreation and strategic gap). It is considered more appropriate to make policy references to the fringes of Hastings and duly qualify the regard to the above issues in identifying any suitable locations.

Object

Hastings Planning Strategy Proposed Submission Version

Key Diagram

Representation ID: 3860

Received: 17/08/2012

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Rother District Council objects to the inclusion of an area shown in the Rother District boundary identified on the key diagram.

Full text:

Rother District Council object to the reference to renewable energy generation in the Combe Valley Countryside Park (and to the inclusion of an area identified on the key diagram is shown in the Rother District boundary), as no comprehensive assessment has been made to determine this is the most appropriate area. Further investigative work is required to determine the most suitable location and therefore it is not appropriate to limit this potential to the Combe Valley Countryside Park, particularly given its objectives (nature conservation, recreation and strategic gap). It is considered more appropriate to make policy references to the fringes of Hastings and duly qualify the regard to the above issues in identifying any suitable locations.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.