Policy LRA1 - Holmhurst St Mary

Showing comments and forms 1 to 2 of 2

Object

Development Management Plan Revised Proposed Submission Version March 2014

Representation ID: 5961

Received: 22/04/2014

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

The net capacity of 165 is far too large for the site. The development will ruin a local wildlife site. The open space alongside the historic Grade11 listed buildings give context & unique value to them. Cramming housing into LRA1, 2 & 3 will not provide any benefits such as adding to the green infrastructure network or add to any ecological or recreational value as stated in para.6.19. This inclusion is an example of overbuilding destroying open spaces ruining the character of Hastings. Space is the most under-rated architectural merit. Mitigation measures rarely work & are never monitored.

Full text:

See attached -
Name: R Price
Submission dated 22.04.14 covering Reps 5941-5964 inclusive

Object

Development Management Plan Revised Proposed Submission Version March 2014

Representation ID: 5997

Received: 22/04/2014

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

This site should not be put forward as a site allocation until:
1. The provision for open space 90% of households - greenspace 300m from home. Hastings deficient of greenspace and sport and recreation facilities.
2. ESCC Highways input on access onto The Ridge via private roads is confused.
3. Protection of trees & wildlife
4. Are services - drains etc. achievable
Greenfield site.

Full text:

See attached -
Name: A Ingleton
Submission dated 22.04.14 covering Reps 5994-6032 & 6034-6040 inclusive