Policy LP1 - Considering Planning Applications

Showing comments and forms 1 to 4 of 4

Object

Development Management Plan Revised Proposed Submission Version March 2014

Representation ID: 5847

Received: 22/04/2014

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

The 'partner organisations' surely include English Heritage, who are authoritative on what is and is not enabling development.

Full text:

The 'partner organisations' surely include English Heritage, who are authoritative on what is and is not enabling development.

Object

Development Management Plan Revised Proposed Submission Version March 2014

Representation ID: 5876

Received: 22/04/2014

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to current wording of policy in relation to transport impacts on locally important routes, especially The Ridge. Inconsistent with national policy as requires mitigation in advance of proper assessment.

Full text:

See attached -
Name: Marstans Plc via Nathaniel Litchfield & Partners
Submission dated 22.04.14 covering Reps 5876 & 5877

Object

Development Management Plan Revised Proposed Submission Version March 2014

Representation ID: 5893

Received: 22/04/2014

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

The new Borough Plan is still unsound, justified, and if challenged in the High Court will fail as the Infrastructure has not been upgraded since Victorian times and is not designed for modern lorries, the sewage system is already seriously overloaded. At Rock-a-Nore the sewage transfer station when overloaded pumps sewage straight into the sea, I understand that it will become illegal to do this in less than 4 years time.
All Town Planning must start with Sound, Justified, seriously Effective up-to-date infrastructure. Much better planning with the necessary infrastructure, quality houses and play facilities is required.

Full text:

See attached -
Name: D Wise
Submission dated 22.04.14 covering Reps 5893 & 5894

Object

Development Management Plan Revised Proposed Submission Version March 2014

Representation ID: 5979

Received: 17/04/2014

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

This draft policy is unnecessary as there is a statutory requirement for the Council to have regard to the development plan and other material consideration under the provision of Section 38 (6) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 . Within this context, the National Panning Policy Framework is a material planning consideration. This includes a presumption in favour in sustainable development that avoids adverse impact upon the natural and built environment, etc.

As regards the affordable housing element of the draft Policy, this merely repeats the requirements of Policy H3 of the Hastings Planning Strategy adopted on 19.02.14.

Full text:

See attached -
Name: The Park Lane Group via TCPS
Submission dated 17.04.14 covering Reps 5972-5981 inclusive