B03 - Former Westerleigh School playing field

Comment

Representation ID: 2495

Received: 11/04/2012

7 units seems reasonable - keeping existing trees.

Comment

Representation ID: 2937

Received: 24/04/2012

Sites B03 and B04 (Former Westerleigh school). The proposed density of development (75 units in total) seems way too high and out of character with the surrounding area. I would support the keeping of this area as a green space, but if residential development is to go ahead it needs to be of good quality, detached properties that blend with the neighbourhood.

Object

Representation ID: 3006

Received: 10/04/2012

Infrastructure not adequate, more traffic, over populated, not enough water as it is, Ridge and Hastings cannot cope with any more traffic, schools, doctors, hospital shortage

Object

Representation ID: 3170

Received: 08/05/2012

B03 & B04 Former Westerleigh School -the proposals would be an over-development. I am surprised that B04 just over 2 ha.) is thought suitable for 68 units, whilst B03 (about 0.5 ha.) only 7 units. For access reasons, which have already been commented on, the two sites needs to be considered
in harmony.

Comment

Representation ID: 3297

Received: 26/04/2012

Little Ridge-&-Ashdown and Filsham-&-Bulverhythe are closely located to the A21 and A259 respectively and have been targeted for significant amounts of residential and employment development. It is important therefore, that development within these areas come forward with associated sustainable transport infrastructure to reduce the need to travel by car and the impact on the SRN.

Should these sites be carried forward to the next consultation stage it will be necessary to show how their impact will be mitigated. This is also true with large development sites in Filsham-&-Bulverhythe which are likely to generate traffic on the A259 west of Bexhill.