h)
Comment
Hastings Local Development Framework - Core Strategy Informal Consultaton 27 June - 8 August 2011
Representation ID: 1802
Received: 27/07/2011
Integration to be assessed in advance & a sensitive approach by HBC towards subsequent comments from the entire community.
Support
Hastings Local Development Framework - Core Strategy Informal Consultaton 27 June - 8 August 2011
Representation ID: 1828
Received: 05/08/2011
We believe it is important that this is adhered to and support the policy.
Support
Hastings Local Development Framework - Core Strategy Informal Consultaton 27 June - 8 August 2011
Representation ID: 1851
Received: 18/07/2011
Support
Support
Hastings Local Development Framework - Core Strategy Informal Consultaton 27 June - 8 August 2011
Representation ID: 1921
Received: 08/08/2011
I agree but, also, there should be clear public consultation with the residents likely to be affected and their views should be taken into account.
Object
Hastings Local Development Framework - Core Strategy Informal Consultaton 27 June - 8 August 2011
Representation ID: 1958
Received: 30/08/2011
'Small clusters of affordable housing would be preferred'. Make it a policy, not a wish list. English Partnerships (now part of HCA) Quality Standards recommends not more than 6 together, and HBC Preferred Approach 25 requires 'pepperpotting' throughout the site - if you are using that standard, then make it mandatory. Incidentally, where does this leave sites such as that at 73 Filsham Road, where the original private development of 21 homes has during the planning process been taken over by Orbit Housing? Surely that is in direct conflict with this policy? Will this policy have any teeth at all?