Comment

Representation ID: 9682

Received: 27/03/2015

We still question whether the Plan achieves a balance between the three mutually dependent dimensions of sustainable development.

In particular we are disappointed to see that four sites that are currently designated for their biodiversity value are still allocated for development in the Plan (LRA1, LRA8, GH3 and FB14). We also cannot support the continued squeeze of Marline Woods SSSI and particularly do not think that allocations LRA6 and LRA9 conform to paragraph 118 of the National Planning Policy Framework.