Object
Hastings Development Management Plan Proposed Submission Version
Representation ID: 5536
Received: 15/04/2013
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The designation is problematical. The basis by which the playing fields are not Private Open Space is unexplained!
It is a single site with a single owner within a single curtilage. Policy CLBXb) mentions the ongoing management of the whole site as a single entity and as a place of special significance.
Additionally, the assertion in the URS Sustainability Appraisal p179 that the Convent is a brownfield site is clearly disputable. Also this report p41 states:of the allocated sites 20/79 will result in the loss of fully greenfield sites. Therefore the treatment of private open space is unsatisfactory.
See attached.
Name: Mr B McGinley
Submission received 15.04.13 covering Reps: 5533-5539