Object

Hastings Development Management Plan Proposed Submission Version

Representation ID: 5492

Received: 15/04/2013

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

The convent and its grounds should be protected from inappropriate development as they are precious assets in terms of both local and national heritage and public amenity. They should be designated as PRIVATE OPEN SPACE and not identified/ allocated. How can we legitimately sanction a culture bid for Hastings and Bexhill for the title of UK Capital of Culture when we are planning to destroy a beautiful historic building in the middle of over-populated Central St Leonards. 1) They are MAJOR elements of the Conservation areas (Local Plan 2004) 2) These grounds make an important contribution to the townscape of this historic area. 3) Inappropriate development of this unique place would diminish the possibility of tourism and its attractiveness to future residents.

Full text:

The convent and its grounds should be protected from inappropriate development as they are precious assets in terms of both local and national heritage and public amenity. They should be designated as PRIVATE OPEN SPACE and not identified/ allocated. How can we legitimately sanction a culture bid for Hastings and Bexhill for the title of UK Capital of Culture when we are planning to destroy a beautiful historic building in the middle of over-populated Central St Leonards. 1) They are MAJOR elements of the Conservation areas (Local Plan 2004) 2) These grounds make an important contribution to the townscape of this historic area. 3) Inappropriate development of this unique place would diminish the possibility of tourism and its attractiveness to future residents.