iii)
Object
Development Management Plan Revised Proposed Submission Version March 2014
Representation ID: 5751
Received: 20/04/2014
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
There is no justification for knocking down these fine buildings, which are on the cusp of a conservation area and opposite two other architecturally valuable buildings, The Baptist Church and the derelict building on the other side of the road.
27 units are too many in an already overpopulated area.
The proposed designs are not as fitting to this unique victorian valley as the buildings that are already present. It is not environmentally friendly to knock down two perfectly sound and substantial villas.
There is no justification for knocking down these fine buildings, which are on the cusp of a conservation area and opposite two other architecturally valuable buildings, The Baptist Church and the derelict building on the other side of the road.
27 units are too many in an already overpopulated area.
The proposed designs are not as fitting to this unique victorian valley as the buildings that are already present. It is not environmentally friendly to knock down two perfectly sound and substantial villas.
Object
Development Management Plan Revised Proposed Submission Version March 2014
Representation ID: 5767
Received: 19/04/2014
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
The proposed development does not in any way "sustain and enhance the significance and setting of the adjacent Kings Road Conservation Area" The proposed structure is to large and dominating and at odds with the surrounding victorian architecture which should be valued and protected as it is hugely central to the regeneration of this area.
The disastrous effects of allowing this kind of development can already be seen in the large grey and totally inappropriate block of flats that already exists nearby on Chapel Park Road. Further developments of this kind should not be allowed to continue.
The proposed development does not in any way "sustain and enhance the significance and setting of the adjacent Kings Road Conservation Area" The proposed structure is to large and dominating and at odds with the surrounding victorian architecture which should be valued and protected as it is hugely central to the regeneration of this area.
The disastrous effects of allowing this kind of development can already be seen in the large grey and totally inappropriate block of flats that already exists nearby on Chapel Park Road. Further developments of this kind should not be allowed to continue.
Object
Development Management Plan Revised Proposed Submission Version March 2014
Representation ID: 5839
Received: 22/04/2014
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
The significance and setting of the King's Road Conservation Area would have been better sustained and enhanced by heeding the advice of your adviser Nick Antram (aka 'Pevsner') to include 1 & 3 Chapel Park Road in the King's Road Conservation Area. This point (iii) is humbug. There is no sustaining. There is no enhancement.
The significance and setting of the King's Road Conservation Area would have been better sustained and enhanced by heeding the advice of your adviser Nick Antram (aka 'Pevsner') to include 1 & 3 Chapel Park Road in the King's Road Conservation Area. This point (iii) is humbug. There is no sustaining. There is no enhancement.