Policy SH2 - Land at Osborne House, The Ridge

Showing comments and forms 1 to 2 of 2

Object

Development Management Plan Revised Proposed Submission Version March 2014

Representation ID: 5964

Received: 22/04/2014

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Disgusting way you behaved. A historic valuable building destroyed for profit. Outline planning permission given before the consultation complete. You allowed the developer to level a historic Victorian garden without any ecological survey. You allowed the developer to kick out the nursing home residents & demolished the building for profit. The legal agreement it was subject to was ignored. Rather than redevelop & keep the existing building you went for max net capacity. You say previously no comments, but I opposed the application and did previously comment.

Full text:

See attached -
Name: R Price
Submission dated 22.04.14 covering Reps 5941-5964 inclusive

Object

Development Management Plan Revised Proposed Submission Version March 2014

Representation ID: 6005

Received: 22/04/2014

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Planning permission has been given.
Osborne House a Victorian heritage asset has been demolished even after several protests. The large wildlife area has not been properly protected and a Section 106 agreement made between the developers and the relevant wildlife groups.

The area of the site has been reduced from 2.97 hectares to 2.80 hectares? Proper enforcement has not been carried out.

Full text:

See attached -
Name: A Ingleton
Submission dated 22.04.14 covering Reps 5994-6032 & 6034-6040 inclusive