Policy LRA3 - Land adjacent to 777 The Ridge
Object
Development Management Plan Revised Proposed Submission Version March 2014
Representation ID: 5881
Received: 16/04/2014
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Area unsuitable for residential use. No consideration given to traffic levels, services required or impact on existing residents.
LRA2 - Playing fields should be protected especially with development at Holmhurst St Mary. Inadequate consideration given to traffic, services and impact on existing residents.
LRA3 - Area unsuitable for residential use. No consideration given to traffic levels, services required or impact on existing residents.
Object
Development Management Plan Revised Proposed Submission Version March 2014
Representation ID: 5963
Received: 22/04/2014
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
The net capacity of 165 is far too large for the site. The development will ruin a local wildlife site. The open space alongside the historic Grade11 listed buildings give context & unique value to them. Cramming housing into LRA1, 2 & 3 will not provide any benefits such as adding to the green infrastructure network or add to any ecological or recreational value as stated in para.6.19. This inclusion is an example of overbuilding destroying open spaces ruining the character of Hastings. Space is the most under-rated architectural merit. Mitigation measures rarely work & are never monitored.
See attached -
Name: R Price
Submission dated 22.04.14 covering Reps 5941-5964 inclusive
Object
Development Management Plan Revised Proposed Submission Version March 2014
Representation ID: 5999
Received: 22/04/2014
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Should not on site allocation.
As point made for LRA 1 & LRA2
Greenfield site.
See attached -
Name: A Ingleton
Submission dated 22.04.14 covering Reps 5994-6032 & 6034-6040 inclusive