4.38
Object
Development Management Plan Revised Proposed Submission Version March 2014
Representation ID: 5852
Received: 22/04/2014
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
The Policies maps may well demonstrate the boundaries of all the protected green spaces in the Borough but this demonstration is nothing less than hypocritical when 'turning the page' it becomes apparent that Robsack 'A' remains as a development site despite its position in the centre of ancient woodland, local nature reserve: how can this council justify the inclusion of this site for development when it is described as one of Hollington's greatest assets? We have double standards at work here and it is a disgraceful situation.
The Policies maps may well demonstrate the boundaries of all the protected green spaces in the Borough but this demonstration is nothing less than hypocritical when 'turning the page' it becomes apparent that Robsack 'A' remains as a development site despite its position in the centre of ancient woodland, local nature reserve: how can this council justify the inclusion of this site for development when it is described as one of Hollington's greatest assets? We have double standards at work here and it is a disgraceful situation.
Support
Development Management Plan Revised Proposed Submission Version March 2014
Representation ID: 5869
Received: 22/04/2014
The Greenspace potentail of the rail corridor is not as yet adequately protected. Perhaps a special focus area strategy/designation would help confer a protected status likely to appeal to the emerging Greenway vision of Network rail and Castle Ward.
The Greenspace potentail of the rail corridor is not as yet adequately protected. Perhaps a special focus area strategy/designation would help confer a protected status likely to appeal to the emerging Greenway vision of Network rail and Castle Ward.