Policy HN4 - Development affecting heritage assets with archaeological and historic interest or potential interest
Object
Hastings Development Management Plan Proposed Submission Version
Representation ID: 5310
Received: 25/02/2013
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
also see above at 4.16: I find the use of the wording "archaeological and historic interest" extremely confusing. I am a historic environment profesional, and even I don't know what you mean. As I read it, this section/policy is only about below ground remains (ie archaeology) and SAMs. History/historic can be anything, whether above or below ground. It would be preferable to keep this part about below ground archaeology and SAMs, and have another section that deals with non-designated but nonetheless historically significant assets. Historic does not mean archaeological.
also see above at 4.16: I find the use of the wording "archaeological and historic interest" extremely confusing. I am a historic environment profesional, and even I don't know what you mean. As I read it, this section/policy is only about below ground remains (ie archaeology) and SAMs. History/historic can be anything, whether above or below ground. It would be preferable to keep this part about below ground archaeology and SAMs, and have another section that deals with non-designated but nonetheless historically significant assets. Historic does not mean archaeological.
Object
Hastings Development Management Plan Proposed Submission Version
Representation ID: 5351
Received: 10/04/2013
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Support Policy HN4, but see ICEHOUSE (Rep.5345):
Similarly: Olive Lodge Arboretum (150 specimens); seeking PAWS status (1778 survey). 1892 Title,
registered 1956, UNCHANGED!
HBC back developer's assault by OS-1988 errors.
2003: HBC withheld "historic" Arboretum from Planning Inspector.
2012: HBC dismissed Title; "you should be aware that the Council does not have any records regarding land ownership. All land ownership records are held by the Land Registry [Tel.]. The Council is therefore unable to give an opinion as to what is covered by the title deed you refer to."
HBC HS/FA/12/00182 encroaching "historic Arboretum".
VIDEO: Logger names 'officer' pre-empting TPOs!
Support Policy HN4, but see ICEHOUSE (Rep.5345):
Similarly: Olive Lodge Arboretum (150 specimens); seeking PAWS status (1778 survey). 1892 Title,
registered 1956, UNCHANGED!
HBC back developer's assault by OS-1988 errors.
2003: HBC withheld "historic" Arboretum from Planning Inspector.
2012: HBC dismissed Title; "you should be aware that the Council does not have any records regarding land ownership. All land ownership records are held by the Land Registry [Tel.]. The Council is therefore unable to give an opinion as to what is covered by the title deed you refer to."
HBC HS/FA/12/00182 encroaching "historic Arboretum".
VIDEO: Logger names 'officer' pre-empting TPOs!