Key Diagram
Object
Hastings Planning Strategy Proposed Submission Version
Representation ID: 3860
Received: 17/08/2012
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Rother District Council objects to the inclusion of an area shown in the Rother District boundary identified on the key diagram.
Rother District Council object to the reference to renewable energy generation in the Combe Valley Countryside Park (and to the inclusion of an area identified on the key diagram is shown in the Rother District boundary), as no comprehensive assessment has been made to determine this is the most appropriate area. Further investigative work is required to determine the most suitable location and therefore it is not appropriate to limit this potential to the Combe Valley Countryside Park, particularly given its objectives (nature conservation, recreation and strategic gap). It is considered more appropriate to make policy references to the fringes of Hastings and duly qualify the regard to the above issues in identifying any suitable locations.
Object
Hastings Planning Strategy Proposed Submission Version
Representation ID: 4126
Received: 09/08/2012
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Maps and key diagram are unacceptable.
See attached.
Object
Hastings Planning Strategy Proposed Submission Version
Representation ID: 4214
Received: 13/08/2012
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The key diagram does not distinguish between areas that are within the AONB and those that are "significant open spaces". As it stands, land indicated at the western edge of Hastings (Marline Woods area) could be construed as being within the AONB, which it is not. The key diagram is therefore imprecise and as such is an 'unsound' element of the Strategy. Clearer definition of the AONB and SOSs would remedy this.
See attached.