2.7
Object
Hastings Planning Strategy Proposed Submission Version
Representation ID: 3883
Received: 17/08/2012
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
2.7 Hastings borough council does reject the idea that environmental action is a barrier to growth. Cllr Godfrey Daniel, chairman of HBC planning, voted in favour of proposed development at Archery Ground. Planners entertained the madcap scheme. Refused permission because it was 'not in sympathy with appearance of the area, didn't maintain or enhance the buildings or street scene, didn't display high quality distinctive architecture, wouldn't make a positive contribution to the quality of historic buildings, is of poor design, doesn't enhance heritage assets.'
Another example is imminent destruction of Combe Haven Valley, for a five mile stretch of road.
2.7 Hastings borough council does reject the idea that environmental action is a barrier to growth. Cllr Godfrey Daniel, chairman of HBC planning, voted in favour of proposed development at Archery Ground. Planners entertained the madcap scheme. Refused permission because it was 'not in sympathy with appearance of the area, didn't maintain or enhance the buildings or street scene, didn't display high quality distinctive architecture, wouldn't make a positive contribution to the quality of historic buildings, is of poor design, doesn't enhance heritage assets.'
Another example is imminent destruction of Combe Haven Valley, for a five mile stretch of road.
Object
Hastings Planning Strategy Proposed Submission Version
Representation ID: 4127
Received: 09/08/2012
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The comments here more or less contradict themselves.
See attached.