D43 - St Ethelburga's Church Hall

Comment

Representation ID: 2252

Received: 11/02/2012

Yet again there is no indication of which type of residential development is proposed. Flats would only be appropriate if private amenity space was included in the design and adequate parking spaces in this busy area. Judging from the density of the proposals it would appear that even more flats are being proposed and this is not good at all.Hastings has more than its fair share of flats and some of these are not fit for purpose.Why can't developers be minded to build houses here? Is it always about profit?

Comment

Representation ID: 2255

Received: 13/02/2012

This site could provide an opportunity for residential development providing there is provision for garden space. Flats would not be appropriate. The development should consist of well designed family houses with adequate parking facilities.

Object

Representation ID: 2967

Received: 10/04/2012

Infrastructure not adequate, more traffic, over populated, not enough water as it is, Ridge and Hastings cannot cope with any more traffic, schools, doctors, hospital shortage

Comment

Representation ID: 3302

Received: 26/04/2012

Little Ridge-&-Ashdown and Filsham-&-Bulverhythe are closely located to the A21 and A259 respectively and have been targeted for significant amounts of residential and employment development. It is important therefore, that development within these areas come forward with associated sustainable transport infrastructure to reduce the need to travel by car and the impact on the SRN.

Should these sites be carried forward to the next consultation stage it will be necessary to show how their impact will be mitigated. This is also true with large development sites in Filsham-&-Bulverhythe which are likely to generate traffic on the A259 west of Bexhill.