E03 - Marline Fields, Enviro21 Business Park, land west of Queensway

Showing comments and forms 1 to 8 of 8

Support

Development Management Plan Consultation Document 3rd February - 27th April 2012

Representation ID: 2275

Received: 01/03/2012

Representation Summary:

The Enviro21 Business Park is a positive developmenrt for the Hastings area

Object

Development Management Plan Consultation Document 3rd February - 27th April 2012

Representation ID: 2660

Received: 26/04/2012

Representation Summary:

Area 1. Sites: E02 E03 and NE01 (object)

To have these as business sites with extra vehicle activities, workers and deliveries with the anticipated link road, these will make this area of Queensway far more congested than the A259 Bexhill Road.

Comment

Development Management Plan Consultation Document 3rd February - 27th April 2012

Representation ID: 2852

Received: 02/04/2012

Representation Summary:

The development will add to the volume of traffic along the Ridge. As congestion increases we are concerned that traffic on the Ridge heading to the A259 or in the opposite direction will cease to use the B&Q junction and use the lanes to join/leave the A259 at the Butchers Lane junction

Object

Development Management Plan Consultation Document 3rd February - 27th April 2012

Representation ID: 3008

Received: 10/04/2012

Representation Summary:

Infrastructure not adequate, more traffic, over populated, not enough water as it is, Ridge and Hastings cannot cope with any more traffic, schools, doctors, hospital shortage

Comment

Development Management Plan Consultation Document 3rd February - 27th April 2012

Representation ID: 3228

Received: 27/04/2012

Representation Summary:

Marline Valley Woods SSSI-was in a favourable condition at the last review.

The employment allocations along the boundary between PFA 1 and 2 immediately adjoin the SSSI.

For site E02, the Assessment Summary suggests a full ecological survey will be required to determine what constraints exist.

The proximity of E02 and E03 suggest that consideration of the impact of the development on the SSSI would be appropriate.

This would be in tune with your amended policy of "Conserving and enhancing protected biodiversity... including Sites of Special Scientific Interest"

The site may also be sensitive to air quality and water issues

Comment

Development Management Plan Consultation Document 3rd February - 27th April 2012

Representation ID: 3277

Received: 24/04/2012

Representation Summary:

Part of the site area shown may currently be occupied by SUDS which should be retained.

Comment

Development Management Plan Consultation Document 3rd February - 27th April 2012

Representation ID: 3295

Received: 26/04/2012

Representation Summary:

Little Ridge-&-Ashdown and Filsham-&-Bulverhythe are closely located to the A21 and A259 respectively and have been targeted for significant amounts of residential and employment development. It is important therefore, that development within these areas come forward with associated sustainable transport infrastructure to reduce the need to travel by car and the impact on the SRN.

Should these sites be carried forward to the next consultation stage it will be necessary to show how their impact will be mitigated. This is also true with large development sites in Filsham-&-Bulverhythe which are likely to generate traffic on the A259 west of Bexhill.

Comment

Development Management Plan Consultation Document 3rd February - 27th April 2012

Representation ID: 3430

Received: 03/04/2012

Representation Summary:

Focus areas 1 and 4 propose a total of 520 residences all requiring direct access onto the already heavily congested Ridge Road. This is ludicrous. With the projected increase arising from traffic using the new link road, there will be traffic congestion on a similar scale to that existing on the present A259 route from the western entrance to Hastings.
No further building of residential property should be permitted until a satisfactory solution has been made to the A21 problem.