Option 2: Some more stringent guidance
Comment
Development Management Plan Consultation Document 3rd February - 27th April 2012
Representation ID: 2259
Received: 13/02/2012
5.28
As of 5.27 - What does this paragraph mean, impossible to comprehend
Support
Development Management Plan Consultation Document 3rd February - 27th April 2012
Representation ID: 2400
Received: 02/04/2012
More stringent minimum standards needed. Historical context of Hastings is relevant.
Comment
Development Management Plan Consultation Document 3rd February - 27th April 2012
Representation ID: 2812
Received: 27/04/2012
We would be interested to see what option 2 some more stringent guidance might say and wonder if option 1 could be beefed up after the style of current policies dealing with conservation areas; i.e. expecting applicants to be aware of the listing and the responsibilities that might bring in terms of heritage protection. We do not think relying on national guidance is adequate
Support
Development Management Plan Consultation Document 3rd February - 27th April 2012
Representation ID: 3106
Received: 27/04/2012
Support Option 2 - more stringent guidance. The suggested policy wording is nebulous and fails to set any quantifiable standards. Reference should be made to English Heritage's methodology for assessing significance of both areas and individual heritage assets.