defining a development boundary - The first issue

Support

Representation ID: 2388

Received: 02/04/2012

There should be a defined boundary.I would say that the Holmhurst St Mary site (A31) should be OUTSIDE the proposed boundary.

Support

Representation ID: 2610

Received: 27/04/2012

I support the creation of a development boundary to inform developers and planners where to build and not build.

Support

Representation ID: 3093

Received: 27/04/2012

Support a defined boundary, thus removing from future consideration several areas suggested in the rest of the document

Support

Representation ID: 3128

Received: 08/05/2012

The main criticism I have of the consultation, so far as the 'macro' issues are concerned, is that whilst we might be given alternatives (ie: development boundary or no development boundary) not much meat is added to those bones.
I favour the retention of the existing development boundary.