para 2

Showing comments and forms 1 to 4 of 4

Support

Hastings Local Development Framework - Core Strategy Informal Consultaton 27 June - 8 August 2011

Representation ID: 1806

Received: 27/07/2011

Representation Summary:

Agreed.

Object

Hastings Local Development Framework - Core Strategy Informal Consultaton 27 June - 8 August 2011

Representation ID: 1931

Received: 08/08/2011

Representation Summary:

It is not clear whether the term 'properties' refers to individual houses or each self contained unit within a house. If it's the latter (which I am informed it informed it is) then we are looking at it being acceptable for every fourth or fifth house to become an HMO. This is over twice the density allowed anywhere else in the Country.

Object

Hastings Local Development Framework - Core Strategy Informal Consultaton 27 June - 8 August 2011

Representation ID: 1934

Received: 08/08/2011

Representation Summary:

These criteria fail to take into account any antisocial behaviour factors (e.g. noise, crime rates, littering, etc)which runs contrary to the 'best practise' recommended by Central Government and would make HBC the only local authority that refuses to address the issues of 'anitsocial behaviour' in its Local Development Plan.

Comment

Hastings Local Development Framework - Core Strategy Informal Consultaton 27 June - 8 August 2011

Representation ID: 2120

Received: 04/08/2011

Representation Summary:

Concerned about restrictions on development due to increased risk of noise disturbance - impact depends on the occupants at any specific time. Blanket imposition of car parking restrictions discriminates against residents of shared dwellings.