D: Proposed Policy - Houses in multiple occupation

Support

Representation ID: 1832

Received: 05/08/2011

We support policies that will encourage local communities that are mixed and balanced in terms of both the type of housing available, tenure and the people who live in them.

Support

Representation ID: 1853

Received: 18/07/2011

Support

Support

Representation ID: 1883

Received: 07/08/2011

Support

Object

Representation ID: 1929

Received: 08/08/2011

The proposed HMO policy fails to provide any resonable levels of control over the location, proliferation, management or standards of HMOs to the detriment of both the local community and the tenants.

Object

Representation ID: 1959

Received: 30/08/2011

The exclusions from the policy are unacceptable. These are the very types of multiple occupation dwellings that cause neighbours the most concern. All types should be included.

Support

Representation ID: 2048

Received: 08/08/2011

Agree

Comment

Representation ID: 2070

Received: 08/08/2011

Too many homes concentrated in a small area amounts to vast amounts of concerns and problems. St Andrews has many badly managed homes with tennants who do not care.

Object

Representation ID: 2119

Received: 04/08/2011

Has the ongoing need/demand for shared housing (small HMO's) been assessed?

Must provide for the accommodation needs of single persons.

Comment

Representation ID: 2125

Received: 08/08/2011

4.11 Concentration of HMO's in small areas appears to lead to anti-social problems and concerns.

4.14 St Andrews is a high HMO area, leading to badly managed tenants and anti-social problems.

Support

Representation ID: 2144

Received: 08/08/2011

Policy D on HMO's and HBC's initiative W.R.T. the Housing Association "Local Space" will benefit and regenerate the town and are to be applauded.

Object

Representation ID: 2225

Received: 09/08/2011

I object to Section D, HMO's para 4.14. There it is suggested that HMOs are integrated in all areas of the community. This is grossly unfair to residents who have bought properties in quiet and more exclusive areas at heightened values, who would see much of that benefit negated and property values lowered.