Preferred Approach 33: Car Parking
Object
Core Strategy Preferred Approaches
Representation ID: 75
Received: 03/07/2008
A balanced 'carrot and stick' approach is required of limiting parking provision in parallel with maximising access to the town centre by means other than the car. Traffic congestion is itself a barrier to increased public transport, cycling and walking and measures to tackle this will be required in order to support the required move away from excess car usage.
Object
Core Strategy Preferred Approaches
Representation ID: 102
Received: 07/07/2008
We do not consider park and ride a sustainable option as it encourages car use as well as leading to the loss of greenfield.
Support
Core Strategy Preferred Approaches
Representation ID: 159
Received: 08/07/2008
Why not hypothesize a percentage of revenue from urban car parking to fund more sustainable travel modes into and through the town ie revenue to match the existing investment in the Hastings Greenway Project?
Comment
Core Strategy Preferred Approaches
Representation ID: 201
Received: 15/07/2008
Consider a park and ride at Wilting for London and Brighton commuters
Support
Core Strategy Preferred Approaches
Representation ID: 361
Received: 24/07/2008
no comment
Support
Core Strategy Preferred Approaches
Representation ID: 396
Received: 30/06/2008
Supported because of environmental savings
Support
Core Strategy Preferred Approaches
Representation ID: 472
Received: 23/06/2008
No comment
Support
Core Strategy Preferred Approaches
Representation ID: 1100
Received: 07/07/2008
The HA support all measures that seek to maximise sustainable transport options with the overall aim of reducing the need to travel by car, particularly, as stated the opportunities for non-car based travel should be fully exploited before any increase in car parking provision. The HA supports the continued development of LATS; the joint working with Rother greatly improves its chances of success. The location of car parking and park and ride facilities requires careful planning as both have the ability of attracting and generating car based trips to the detriment of the highway network.
Object
Core Strategy Preferred Approaches
Representation ID: 1124
Received: 08/07/2008
Note the suggestion of a 'park and ride' facility near the A21/A28, and at Wilting (if there is a station), but question whether there is sufficient justification for these, as well as their locations.
Support
Core Strategy Preferred Approaches
Representation ID: 1141
Received: 07/07/2008
support Park & Ride
Support
Core Strategy Preferred Approaches
Representation ID: 1166
Received: 04/07/2008
Support theory of access to town centre by other means than the car.
Comment
Core Strategy Preferred Approaches
Representation ID: 1489
Received: 08/07/2008
Whilst it is appreciated that demand management measures need to be introduced on a strategic basis, the County Council's view is that demand management should be introduced alongside, sustainable transport measures to encourage a modal shift based upon the 'carrot & stick' principle.
Object
Core Strategy Preferred Approaches
Representation ID: 1490
Received: 08/07/2008
It is unclear how the proposals for park & ride at Wilting would relate to any proposals for housing and/or employment uses as suggested in PA19. Park & ride proposals at neither Wilting nor Baldslow have been tested to assess their impact on the transport network. PA33 should reflect this.
Object
Core Strategy Preferred Approaches
Representation ID: 1566
Received: 08/07/2008
The LDF doesn't address coach parking & park & ride.
Object
Core Strategy Preferred Approaches
Representation ID: 1622
Received: 07/07/2008
It is not clear which is the preferred approach or how this will be developed into a clear policy particularly as they seem to relate to land in Rother.
Object
Core Strategy Preferred Approaches
Representation ID: 1654
Received: 07/07/2008
No solution in the short term for visitor parking given removal of Coach park