Preferred Approach 31: Local Road Improvements
Support
Core Strategy Preferred Approaches
Representation ID: 7
Received: 29/05/2008
Support in principle but road humps should be abolished
Object
Core Strategy Preferred Approaches
Representation ID: 73
Received: 03/07/2008
This approach fails to recognise the changes that will need to be made in transport and travel modes during the lifetime of this plan and remains stuck in the out-dated thinking that road building equals regeneration.
Object
Core Strategy Preferred Approaches
Representation ID: 290
Received: 23/07/2008
(18.5) disagree - "Hastings link road would reduce congestion and improve air quality"
You would just remove the congestion problem to somewhere else and pollution knows no boundaries.
Support
Core Strategy Preferred Approaches
Representation ID: 359
Received: 24/07/2008
no comment
Support
Core Strategy Preferred Approaches
Representation ID: 392
Received: 30/06/2008
Supported for what little good it will do
Support
Core Strategy Preferred Approaches
Representation ID: 474
Received: 23/06/2008
No comment
Comment
Core Strategy Preferred Approaches
Representation ID: 1333
Received: 14/07/2008
This PA might usefully have mentioned area wide 20mph speed limits (fundamental in promoting strong growth in walking and cycling), and 'Home Zones' as aspriations. These could lead to a much higher public realm, and demostrably deliver road casualty reductions.
A strong 'sense of place' would be a result of the above approach (PA 31) and the traffic calmed areas would give parents confidence to let their children play outside. This would lead to community cohesion.
Object
Core Strategy Preferred Approaches
Representation ID: 1561
Received: 08/07/2008
The LDF doesn't address upgrade roads & footpaths.
Comment
Core Strategy Preferred Approaches
Representation ID: 1626
Received: 07/07/2008
We would not normally expect to see references to saved policies within Policy wordings for submission.