Object
Hastings Development Management Plan Proposed Submission Version
Representation ID: 5340
Received: 09/04/2013
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Development Management Plan, DUTY TO CO-OPERATE, p.7/46, Hastings Local Plan §3.9, Neighbourhood Plans for local people to prepare detailed plans for own areas deliberately pre-empted by rushing contentious (flawed) planning applications from submission to Planning Committee 42 days. i.e. without adequate local notice, or in the case of HS/FA/13/00114 (TN38 0SP) none at all in favoured developer's back-yard of 29 residences; only withdrawn day before another 'rubber-stamp' when ESCC supported objectors rebutting false invalid land-ownership Certificates A. Petitioners expressed such concern for Gillsmans' woodlands their inputs to any Neighbourhood Plan assured; Spyway GH3' certainly would be voided.
Development Management Plan, DUTY TO CO-OPERATE, p.7/46, Hastings Local Plan §3.9, Neighbourhood Plans for local people to prepare detailed plans for own areas deliberately pre-empted by rushing contentious (flawed) planning applications from submission to Planning Committee 42 days. i.e. without adequate local notice, or in the case of HS/FA/13/00114 (TN38 0SP) none at all in favoured developer's back-yard of 29 residences; only withdrawn day before another 'rubber-stamp' when ESCC supported objectors rebutting false invalid land-ownership Certificates A. Petitioners expressed such concern for Gillsmans' woodlands their inputs to any Neighbourhood Plan assured; Spyway GH3' certainly would be voided.